As always the subject of breast feeding is topical.
I have set out below a quasi historical perspective.
Breast feeding
My views about breast feeding have for years been non mainstream.
Many years ago after reports that the early unmodified bottle milks could cause problems with excessive sodium load contain the wrong sort of constituent fats they were modified and these problems eased .
Certainly in countries where a safe supply of water is not readily available then use of powdered formula milks can increase the risk of infection. This is not a problem with preprepared bottled milks but these are too expensive for general use in poor countries
It may be that the composition of iron in breast milk ( lactoferrin ) is less available to bacteria and better absorbed by the infant.
There is also some evidence that the infants ability to fight infection may be helped by immunoglobulin present in breast but not bottled milk.
All these advantages of breast feeding are real and hugely important on a world population level.
But like so many edicts they are not so relevant for many.
Why do mothers I see choose to breast feed second and third children children less often.than their first borne – surely if the experience of breast feeding is so inspiring then the opposite would be true.?
Clearly there are lots of possible reasons but here are a few - Because it is harder work than bottle feeding, can only be done by them and leads to sleepless nights. It limits their ability to look after their other children, to socialise outside of the home and to go back to work
A pre-programmed NHS midwife or health visitor at this point would interject that the “ welfare of the infant is paramount”
Whereas I would in no way wish to disagree with this excellent sentiment I would suggest that the physical and mental health and well being of the mother might also be relevant. It should certainly not be proffered in a manner that is likely to make the mother feel guilty because she wants a life.
The recent news that biological tweeking has enabled cow’s to produce milk that is in all intents identical to human breast milk I see as a great step forward in human health rather than has been interpreted as a lamentable reduction in cow’s because they may be more prone to mastitis.
I guess the take home message is that that al is not as black and white as might be suggested.